Understanding Form 1099-DA and How It Affects Crypto Investors

The IRS Form 1099-DA is set to be required starting January 1, 2025 for all digital asset brokers.

Introduction

The IRS has created the first tax form meant just for crypto and digital assets. This form, Form 1099-DA, will change how cryptocurrencies are reported both to the IRS and to individuals, shifting a lot of the reporting duties from taxpayers to brokers. More details on this are coming up.

Background

In April 2024, the IRS shared the initial draft of Form 1099-DA, with further requirements for custodial brokers announced in July 2024 and a revised draft in August 2024. This form and the associated reporting rules will bring more transparency and detailed reporting to the crypto space than ever before. For the first time, transactions involving cryptocurrencies will be reported similarly to how traditional assets like stocks and securities are reported. Starting with the 2025 tax year, the IRS will receive a massive amount of information about taxpayer’s crypto activities.

Key Points

  1. This form is meant to standardize reporting guidelines for digital assets, requiring all brokers to submit a 1099-DA to both the IRS and the taxpayer. According to the IRS, a broker is defined as any entity that “regularly provides services effectuating transfers of digital assets on behalf of another person.” This includes exchanges, wallet providers that enable trades and transfers, and could potentially even include crypto ATMs. This raises many questions for wallet providers and crypto ATMs that don’t do KYC checks. There’s a chance that brokers who fail to gather the necessary information from taxpayers to complete the 1099-DA could be found non-compliant and might face legal issues if they continue working with U.S. taxpayers.
    1. Confusion exists about whether noncustodial wallets will count as brokers under these reporting rules. In the final requirements Rule published by the IRS in July 2024, the IRS specifies that a facilitative service includes any service that directly or indirectly effectuates a sale of digital assets. This could mean that certain unhosted wallets may be subject to these 1099-DA reporting requirements. However, unhosted wallet providers have been removed from the clear definition of broker, adding to the uncertainty we hope the IRS will clarify.n2. The 1099-DA will show proceeds, cost basis, and gain/loss details for each transaction** made through the platform, along with other relevant details. More on cost basis later.n3. There’s a new section regarding wash sales**. Instructions explain: Shows the amount of nondeductible loss in a wash sale transaction involving digital assets that are also stock or securities for tax purposes. This statement is confusing because we know the IRS currently classifies crypto as property. This suggests that new regulations will likely be introduced to clearly disallow wash sales for cryptocurrency. Previously, we shared that the wash sale loophole remains open for crypto in 2024, but it’s expected to close by 2025. This wording in the 1099-DA reinforces those expectations.n4. Noncovered Assets will be clearly identified and documented.** Noncovered assets are those for which the broker did not provide custodial services or were obtained before 2026. If this is indicated, certain fields on the form may be left blank, including the cost basis. It’s crucial to understand this, as proceeds could appear as 100% capital gains without accurate cost basis reported. This will lead to taxpayers paying more tax than they might actually owe. Taxpayers must not rely on 1099-DAs with absent cost basis information for calculating taxes owed.
  2. Brokers need to confirm they are using data provided by the customer. There’s a section where the broker will indicate if they relied on customer data, like cost basis. How this data is submitted can vary by broker. For instance, a platform might allow users to enter their own cost basis for assets, which would then be reflected on the 1099-DA. If that happens, this section will be affirmed.
  3. Both stablecoins and NFT transactions can be grouped together (but separately), as long as the total proceeds are under $10,000 each year. All other digital asset transactions will need to be reported on their own.

Implications For Taxpayers

Taxpayers should expect to receive 1099-DAs from various exchanges and wallet providers. The forms will also be sent directly to the IRS. However, for assets bought before 2025 and assets transferred into an exchange or wallet provider, cost basis information may be inaccurate or missing. Hence, it is critical for taxpayers to keep precise records of their cost basis and report their transactions using Form 8949 (the 1099-DA forms don’t replace the need to report on Form 8949 and Schedule D).

Comments

While the 1099-DA will streamline reporting data, it will not resolve all issues facing taxpayers. There are different cost basis accounting methods available. The default for the 1099-DA will be First-In-First-Out (FIFO), but individual taxpayers can choose Specific Identification (if they meet certain criteria), allowing them to opt for methods like Highest-In-First-Out (HIFO). This might create discrepancies between what’s reported on the 1099-DA and what’s declared on their 8949. Thus, while the 1099-DA aims to enhance transparency in crypto trading, it won’t ensure entirely accurate tax reporting for all taxpayers.

Furthermore, it’s vital that taxpayers do not solely depend on the 1099-DAs, especially when moving assets between wallets and exchanges. When an exchange gets an asset from an outside source, it may assign a blank or $0 cost basis to that asset on the 1099-DA. If this blank data reaches a traditional CPA or a tax software like TurboTax, it could lead to an incorrect assessment of 100% capital gain. Thus, taxpayers should determine the correct cost basis on the assets they transfer and accurately report it on their 8949. By keeping detailed records of all crypto transactions, they can create a solid paper trail to back their numbers and ensure they’re optimizing their tax obligations while staying compliant.

TLDR

As of January 1, 2025, brokers involved with digital assets, including exchanges and some wallet providers, must gather and submit taxpayer transaction data to the IRS using Form 1099-DA. This form will detail proceeds, cost basis, and gains or losses, though missing cost basis data (for non-covered assets) may affect tax obligations. Taxpayers should maintain their own records to ensure accurate tax reporting.

This post discusses tax issues. Tax laws differ by country, so providing your location could help get more useful responses.

Just a reminder, promoting tax evasion goes against Rule 4, so be careful there. This is a site-wide rule that applies everywhere on this forum. You shouldn’t suggest or ask for advice on tax evasion. Don’t be sneaky or sarcastically imply that people should avoid it or use a privacy coin to dodge IRS questions.

Note: Talking about taxes is okay as long as you abide by these rules.

Check out r/CryptoTax for your tax questions.


I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this forum if you have any questions or concerns.

I have to admit, I moved all my assets to an exchange last week because of this change and also I’m hoping for a big market surge in 2025. 2025 might be my exit year from crypto if we reach new highs

Remember all that clarity people were wanting? Now we get more government involvement. You all are the reason we can’t have nice things.

Zander said:
Remember all that clarity people were wanting? Now we get more government involvement. You all are the reason we can’t have nice things.

Would you rather worry about whether the exchange you use will still be around or if you might get audited randomly after doing your best to stay honest?

@Torin
I don’t worry. I just use the exchange for trading, and I’ll self-custody until it’s not workable. If I’m honest and I make a mistake, I’ll take responsibility and correct it. I don’t live in fear; I have faith in God, and truth will prevail.

@Zander
That’s good to hear. However, let’s be real. You likely hold crypto to engage with the crypto community, and you want to keep having a bank account too.

This whole situation will always be a challenge as long as people don’t have clarity; banks and other businesses will be hesitant to take a chance on a stance of ‘if we get audited, we’ll just hope for the best.’ In the past, early Bitcoin users had issues with banks because they saw them as a risky business.

@Torin
Banks have started using third-party systems for Bitcoin and a few other cryptocurrencies. You can hire a CPA. Several apps are being developed for tracking, and a simple spreadsheet will suffice. I was fine with banks not joining in, but here we are. That’s the point; everyone wants it to be simple, and someone else will fix it, but Bitcoin was supposed to remove that need. Bitcoin got co-opted. Many were fooled into believing they needed the government to fix something that was already fine. We warned everyone about this, but it didn’t seem to matter. You got exactly what you asked for, more government intrusion, and that’s just how it is.

@Zander
Banks were turning away customers who had large amounts of money from cryptocurrencies. They closed accounts if there were too many transactions between crypto exchanges and user accounts.

CPAs can drop clients whose situations are too risky. There’s a reason why most crypto firms only get audited by small firms that seem created just for crypto and never by big names like KPMG or PwC, and it’s not about the fees they can’t afford.

The global financial system is unlikely to adopt Bitcoin. If you want crypto to prosper, it must exist alongside traditional finance.

@Torin
I didn’t say the entire financial system should switch to Bitcoin. It was doing well for many people, but then greed entered the picture. The loudest voices demanded it needed to integrate with traditional finance. Some of us believed in developing a separate system.

Zander said:
Remember all that clarity people were wanting? Now we get more government involvement. You all are the reason we can’t have nice things.

Please stop talking like that

Magdalina said:

Zander said:
Remember all that clarity people were wanting? Now we get more government involvement. You all are the reason we can’t have nice things.

Please stop talking like that

Try to keep things civil here

So it sounds like anyone with a non-custodial wallet is going to be in a tough spot unless they pay for a reconciliation every year. Great…